The Papers of John Marshall

Volume IX: Correspondence, Papers, and Selected Judicial Opinions, January 1820-December 1823

Edited by Charles F. Hobson

The Papers of John Marshall

440 pp., 6.125 x 9.25, 5 illus., appends., notes, index

  • Paperback ISBN: 978-1-4696-2348-1
    Published: March 2015

Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture and the University of North Carolina Press

Buy this Book

To purchase online via an independent bookstore, visit Bookshop.org

Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture and the University of North Carolina Press

This volume marks the continuation of the first annotated edition of the papers of John Marshall, the great statesman and jurist. The Supreme Court's most celebrated case during these years was Cohens v. Virginia (1821). What began as a prosecution for the sale of lottery tickets eventually brought forth a major statement on the scope and extent of federal judicial power from Chief Justice Marshall. Like McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Cohens decision provoked the wrath of the guardians of states' rights in Virginia. As his correspondence shows, Marshall was deeply concerned that the reaction to Cohens and other nationalizing decisions would translate into proposals to curb the Supreme Court's powers.

Besides chronicling Marshall's judicial activities, this volume yields illuminating glimpses into his private interests and family life. When not sitting in court, Marshall was busy revising his Life of Washington and preparing an edition of General Washington's letters.

About the Author

Charles F. Hobson, editor of The Papers of John Marshall, is a resident scholar at the William and Mary School of Law.
For more information about Charles F. Hobson, visit the Author Page.

Reviews

"Richly but not excessively annotated, the ninth volume of the Marshall papers provides scholars with the essential documents of the chief justice during four years of the middle period of his tenure on the Court. The editorial accomplishments remain high."--Journal of Southern History