264 pp., 6.125 x 9.25, 11 graphs, 1 tables, notes, bibl., index
Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-4696-3017-5
Published: December 2016
eBook ISBN: 978-1-4696-3018-2
Published: October 2016
Paperback ISBN: 978-1-4696-6153-7
Published: August 2020
Buy this Book
Free E-Exam Copies
Awards & distinctions
One of the Top 20 Books for Understanding China, China Economic Quarterly
Making use of never-before-studied documents from the Soviet politburo and other archives, Miller argues that the difference between the Soviet Union and China--and the ultimate cause of the Soviet collapse--was not economics but politics. The Soviet government was divided by bitter conflict, and Gorbachev, the ostensible Soviet autocrat, was unable to outmaneuver the interest groups that were threatened by his economic reforms. Miller's analysis settles long-standing debates about the politics and economics of perestroika, transforming our understanding of the causes of the Soviet Union's rapid demise.
About the Author
Chris Miller is assistant professor of international history at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and co-director of the school's Russia and Eurasia Program. He is also Eurasia Director at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.
For more information about Chris Miller, visit the Author Page.
“Miller helps readers understand why communism survived in China but encountered an abrupt and amazing collapse in the former Soviet Union. Highly recommended.”--Choice
“Miller’s work goes a great distance in bettering our knowledge and understanding of the politics behind the Soviet economic collapse.”--Reviews in History
“Using new archival material, Miller demonstrates that Gorbachev was always much weaker than many realized.”--Survival: Global Politics and Strategy
“An important contribution to our understanding of the Sino-Soviet interaction and the forces that led to the demise of the Soviet Union.”--The Russian Review
“This book is clearly written and forcefully argued.”--Slavic Review
“It is a well-researched, fluidly written, and timely book that is sure to leave its mark on the historiography.”--H-Diplo