The Bar and the Old Bailey, 1750-1850

“Provides invaluable groundwork for future research into the development of legal ethics and professional discipline.” — Law and History Review

“An important book. . . . [May’s] analysis of the barristers who practiced at the Old Bailey, London’s principal criminal court, puts human flesh on the story of 'lawyerization'. . . . A substantial contribution to the scholarly literature on the history of the bar.” — Albion

“Represents a significant addition to our understanding of the history of the Old Bailey and its advocates in a crucial formative period for English criminal justice.” — Journal of Legal History

“Among the most thoroughly-researched explorations of the relationship between the upper branch of the legal profession and the reforms of the criminal trial to date. . . . Rooted in meticulous research into the diverse working lives of the individuals who made up the London bar, [it gives] readers a sense of the day to day practice at the Old Bailey. . . . A significant contribution.” — Journal of Social History

“A well-researched and important addition to our growing understanding of the evolution of the criminal trial in England.” — American Historical Review

“May’s thorough account of the formation of the Old Bailey bar is necessary reading for anyone interested in the development of the criminal trial or the legal profession in England.” — American Journal of Legal History

“May has written a thoughtful, detailed, and painstakingly researched study that focuses on criminal lawyers who practiced in London’s central criminal court, the Old Bailey, during this era of fundamental legal change.” — Journal of Interdisciplinary History

“A notable contribution to legal history and to the history of the professions, unusually well-written and the product of prodigious research.” — Economic History Review

“May’s volume adds a vital dimension to this earlier scholarship. She fills in the flesh and bones of the story by giving us a greater sense of the identity of the men who were largely responsible for bringing about this change. . . . It is a sobering tale, one that highlights the place of unintended consequences in the history of a profession that often claims to be in control of its own development.” — Reviews in History (the Institute of Historical Research, London)

“May explains how the increasingly active participation of defense counsel resulted in an unplanned transformation of the criminal trial from a search for truth into a process to secure justice for the accused. Surprisingly, this early chapter in the history of the adversary process happened despite reservations and resistance from many in the practicing bar. Yet by the mid-19th century, the criminal trial had been permanently altered. Anyone who wonders how the modern criminal trial became a crucible for adversarial combat will be fascinated by this extraordinary study of the early days.” — James Oldham, Georgetown University