“A book that deserves a wide readership. Its engagement with a number of current debates means that it will work well in the classroom, and its radical reinterpretation of New Deal labor policy means that it is certain to prompt serious thought and reflection.” — American Studies
“The significance of O'Brien’s book transcends its immediate subject. In addition to presenting a fascinating case study of how complex forces and compromises produce statutes, it also provides an important study of the contributions of Progressive Republicanism to the New Deal and the formation of the modern American state.” — American Historical Review
“This is an intriguing and deftly argued book that both rounds out our critical legal understanding of New Deal labor policy and challenges that understanding on key points of interpretation.” — Law and History Review
“[A] well-researched and well-written book.” — CHOICE
“Well researched. . . . Successfully encourages readers to examine critically the state Americans often forgot they had created.” — Labor History
“Must reading for historians and labor law and will be read with profit by those interested in the history of organized labor and of the New Deal.” — Journal of Economic History
“O'Brien forces us to rethink both the New Deal and American party politics as she deftly shows, through extensive new research, how important Republican Party initiatives were in formulating subsequent New Deal labor policy. A provocative and important book on a neglected period of American politics and labor history.” — Victoria C. Hattam, New School for Social Research
“Ruth O'Brien’s compelling story of American labor law poses at least two fundamental challenges to students of American political development. First, it upends a well-established periodization: the New Deal becomes the culmination, not the turning point, in a protracted struggle over the constitution of the liberal person, the status of associations, and the nature of state power. Second, it demonstrates the power of legal ideology in shaping group interests and state strategies. As such, Workers' Paradox should provoke useful debate among a wide variety of scholars.” — Gerald Berk, University of Oregon
