For the People

“Masterfully draws on diverse literatures in political theory, political history, social history, and gender history to offer fresh interpretations of American populist movements from the Revolution to the 1850s. . . . Should become required reading for American historians and political scientists.” — Journal of American History

“An utterly compelling and convincing book that will soon take its rightful place as one of the seminal political histories of nineteenth-century America.” — Journal of Southern History

“Draw[s] on extensive research and a thorough examination of modern scholarship. . . . Essential reading for students of early American politics. . . . Greatly expands our understanding of and appreciation of the complex and paradoxical nature of American populist movements. . . . Will have important implications for current scholarly debates about the meaning and legacy of popular sovereignty in the decades after the Revolution.” — Common-Place

“Formisano’s theme is crucial in American history.” — Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography

“Provide[s] significant new material and insights. . . . Helps to clarify and contextualize the heritage of populism, leading to a better understanding of why its political legacy is indeed mixed.” — Journal of Interdisciplinary History

“Studies populist movements by taking a road less traveled. . . . Focuses on the people who made up the bulk of these movements, the rank and file, and he studies the separate activities as a collection of movements over a longer period.” — Register of the Kentucky Historical Society

“[An] extremely interesting and thorough account of the history of populism in the United States. . . . [Formisano’s] historical knowledge is prodigious and his account of the dynamics of populism in the country’s early decades is obviously definitive. . . . A helpful resource for anyone researching the role of populism in the evolution of American social welfare policy.” — Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare

“[Formisano’s] linkage of seemingly disparate movements should provoke new questions . . . . An important contribution to the history of populist movements and United States political history in general.” — Maryland Historical Magazine

“[A] sweeping survey.” — American Historical Review

“Provide[s] a detailed exploration of disparate movements that are often given short shrift by historians . . . makes a convincing case.” — North Carolina Historical Review