The Democratic Collapse

View Inside

230 pp., 6.125 x 9.25, 7 halftones, notes, bibl., index

Paperback ISBN: 978-1-4696-7143-7
Published: November 2022
Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-4696-7142-0
Published: November 2022
eBook ISBN: 978-1-4696-7144-4
Published: October 2022

Civil War America

Buy this Book

Paperback $27.95
Hardcover $99.00
E-Book $22.99

Amazon Kindle Barnes and Noble Ebooks Apple iBookstore

For Professors:
Free E-Exam Copies

To purchase online via an independent bookstore, visit Bookshop.org

Follow the Author on Twitter

UNC Press Presents Podcast

This fresh examination of antebellum politics comprehensively examines the ways that gender issues and gendered discourse exacerbated fissures within the Democratic Party in the critical years between 1856 and 1861. Whereas the cultural politics of gender had bolstered Democratic unity through the 1850s, the Lecompton crisis and John Brown's raid revealed that white manhood and its association with familial and national protection meant disparate—and ultimately incompatible—things in free and slave society. In fierce debates over the extension of slavery, gendered rhetoric hardened conflicts that ultimately led to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Lauren Haumesser here traces how northern and southern Democrats and their partisan media organs used gender to make powerful arguments about slavery as the sectional crisis grew, from the emergence of the Republican Party to secession. Gendered charges and countercharges turned slavery into an intractable cultural debate, raising the stakes of every dispute and making compromise ever more elusive.

About the Author

Lauren N. Haumesser holds a Ph.D. in History from the University of Virginia.
For more information about Lauren N. Haumesser, visit the Author Page.

Reviews

“Engaging and succinct . . . shed[s] new light on the coming of the Civil War through a careful examination of the gendered rhetoric of Republicans, Democrats, and, ultimately, Constitutional Unionists.”—Civil War Book Review

"The 1860 presidential campaign was conducted in heavily gendered terms. Haumesser shows this was not a sudden, exaggerated reaction by Democrats to the threat of a Republican president. Instead, all of the purple prose and over-the-top political cartoons depicting Lincoln as a tool of feminists and abolitionists emerged from rifts within the Democratic Party during the sectional crisis."—Judith Giesberg, Villanova University

"Crisply and engagingly written, Haumesser's social and political history shows how gender mattered in Civil War–era politics, proving that the very pervasive gendered rhetoric that mobilized Democrats in one election proved their undoing in another."—Aaron Sheehan-Dean, Louisiana State University