292 pp., 6.125 x 9.25, 29 figs., 2 maps
Paperback ISBN: 978-1-4696-3873-7
Published: April 2018
Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-4696-3872-0
Published: April 2018
eBook ISBN: 978-1-4696-3874-4
Published: March 2018
Buy this Book
Free E-Exam Copies
By elucidating the reciprocal influence of two of the most important developments in nineteenth-century American culture—the spectacular city and visionary culture—Clark demonstrates how the nineteenth-century city is not only the birthplace of modern spectacle but also a battleground for the freedom and autonomy of the spectator.
About the Author
Justin T. Clark is assistant professor of history at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
For more information about Justin T. Clark, visit the Author Page.
“…an exciting exploration of the symbiosis between human vision, the material visual, and the visionary in Boston in the three decades before the Civil War.” – The Journal of American History
“City of Second Sight adds to our understanding of the rise of urban culture in New England’s premier city during the antebellum era.” – Journal of the Early Republic
“A rounded and absorbing account . . . sweeping in its aim and thoroughly convincing.” --Journal of Social History
"City of Second Sight is deeply researched, tightly argued, expertly composed. Its premise that a wariness about visual culture resulted in visionary culture is significant not only for the study of visual culture but also for American religious and intellectual history.” --Reviews in American History
“A well-researched and imaginatively conceived history. . . . Clark makes a particularly significant contribution to the history of urban spectatorship in his exploration and articulation of the ways that individuals interpreted, valued, and designed visual experiences in Boston.” --The New England Quarterly Review
“This book stands out for its conceptual virtuosity, imaginative and wide-ranging research, and subtle and sophisticated interpretation of antebellum Boston’s class dynamics as they were catalyzed by the perceived moral danger and moral potential of the sense of sight.”—Tamara Plakins Thornton, University at Buffalo